Cat Rambo ([info]catrambo) wrote,
@ 2009-03-18 14:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: busy
Entry tags:writing

In the Hope This Is Helpful to Others
From my e-mail:

I'm very sorry to pester you, but I write to ask why I'm always being rejected by Fantasy Magazine
 
The rejection always reads something to the effect:  "It's not right for Fantasy Magazine."
 
Then, when you sign it, you say to send many more stories.
 
Cat, is there any way to know what is so bad about my writing?
 
I would really like to publish a piece at Fantasy, because at least then I would have some hope for the future.
 
But the feeling I get is that you and your readers regard me a worthless loser.
 
Is there any way that I could send you a piece that I'm presently working on and receive some feedback before I send in the final draft?

 
And my reply:

We get about 400-500 submissions a month currently, and we print 4-5 a month. You can see from that where, literally, a story has to be better than 99 of its fellows.

As a writer, I know that a rejection slip stings. But as an editor I also know that it's not as simple as good story versus bad story. Sometimes it's a case that the story isn't the right tone - maybe it feels a little too firmly in the territory of horror or science fiction or something else. Sometimes it's a case that we've published too many stories like it recently, or that we've already got five stories about pirates slated for the year and feel a little down on pirates at the time.

I also know as both writer and editor that thickskinnedness and persistence help a lot. In my pre-editor days, I had submitted at least four or five stories to Fantasy Magazine before they ever took one from me. I believe I'm on my 46th submission to the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction right now - but I'll still keep sending, because 1) I know I'm getting better with time, 2) I know that sometimes it's about having a story there at the right time and 3) I'll never get anything in there unless I try.

One thing that I have found helpful is having a writing group that meets periodically and gives each other critiques. There are a number of online ones, if you're in an area that doesn't have a lot of fellow writers. Another is reading other stories and looking at how they work - what makes them stand out? What do they do to grab the reader and make them keep reading?

I hope that's helpful.

all the best,
Cat


I really don't want to sound pissed off, because I'm not, but I will also suggest to readers of this blog that letters like this are a bad idea. You run the risk of irritating an editor by asking for a chunk of their time and energy like this. In my case, I've got a hard enough time getting critiques done for friends, and right now I've got two interviews to prep questions for, queries to draft, a review to write, slush to read, and an e-mail from Lawrence that I need to read and respond to in order to explain why I'm having trouble with one of the stories for the collection -- along with a crapload of other work hanging over my head like a ten-ton sword of Damocles. Plus I'd like to finish this draft of Phat Fairy someday. Meanwhile, the living room calls out for cleaning and I suspect the kitties would like their litter box changed. Be aware that people's time is precious and treat it like the gift it is.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(50 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2009-03-18 09:14 pm UTC (link)
You should have sent him my way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catrambo
2009-03-18 09:20 pm UTC (link)
The thought did occur to me. Are you still offering critiquing services for people? If so, I'll start just sending the details of your rates and contact info next time someone asks for this.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nihilistic_kid, 2009-03-18 09:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catrambo, 2009-03-18 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]reveritas, 2009-03-19 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nihilistic_kid, 2009-03-19 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kynn, 2009-03-18 09:40 pm UTC

[info]j_cheney
2009-03-18 09:16 pm UTC (link)
Is there any way that I could send you a piece that I'm presently working on and receive some feedback before I send in the final draft?

Oh, dear....

I don't think you could have answered this more professionally and civilly than you did.

(Reply to this)


[info]time_shark
2009-03-18 09:36 pm UTC (link)
I've gotten a few like that for CP. I think sometimes people just can't comprehend the sheer volume of competition there is for just a few slots until they've finally seen it from the other side.

I think you handled this admirably.

(Reply to this)


[info]hoppymuk
2009-03-18 09:42 pm UTC (link)
that is a lot more patience and understanding and explanation than I would have shown. I mean, even as someone who has never submitted a piece of writing, I learned in my fiction class in college that expecting anyone to ever publish your shit is setting yourself up for disappointment. You send stuff in because you did your best and think it deserves consideration, not because statitically anyone has any hope of being published. I mean, really.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tchernabyelo
2009-03-18 11:15 pm UTC (link)
I'm glad I never went to college and learned that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosalux, 2009-03-19 02:03 pm UTC

[info]selfavowedgeek
2009-03-18 09:44 pm UTC (link)
Handled with class.

RE: "But as an editor I also know that it's not as simple as good story versus bad story." I'd hasten to add that the gulf between a good story and the great story that gets accepted is rather vast. Reading slush for the past month as Farrago's Wainscot has been rather eye opening in that respect.

(Reply to this)


[info]silenceleigh
2009-03-18 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Wow. I don't think it would have ever occurred to me to write a letter like this; it smacks of writing a letter demanding to know why you didn't get a job/date/prize/whatever.

You handled it very well, I think.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]silenceleigh
2009-03-18 09:53 pm UTC (link)
(and I speak as someone who has actually had people ask her, "so why won't you date me?")

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosalux, 2009-03-19 02:05 pm UTC

[info]amysisson
2009-03-18 11:00 pm UTC (link)
Oh, there is so very much that one could comment on here....

But I'll stick with just this: "But the feeling I get is that you and your readers regard me a worthless loser." If this writer's fiction has never been published in Fantasy, how can Fantasy's readers consider the writer to be a worthless loser, since they don't know of his/her existence in particular?

Is there something going around these days? This is the second such story via LJ in the last week or so.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gerrileen
2009-03-19 01:57 am UTC (link)
Well, actually, we're readers of Cat's LJ and while I'd be hard pressed to say anyone is worthless, the other label is sort of tempting when it comes to the behavior of actually writing this kind of letter. ;-)

Maybe some folks need to get out of their own heads and remember that helpful saying: "It's not all about YOU."

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]catrambo, 2009-03-19 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gerrileen, 2009-03-20 01:57 am UTC

[info]tchernabyelo
2009-03-18 11:12 pm UTC (link)
But it is sometimes helpful to know these things...

I think I now have a fairly clear idea of what WON'T sell to you, though I'm still not sure what WILL (a couple of pieces I thought were right didn't take; on the other hand the one you DID buy was probably the one I was most optimistic about).

I've always assumed that the "please send more" is editorial shorthand for "you can write; it's obvious you can write; when you write the correct story, we'll buy it". In other words, the mechanics and techniques are all there, it's just hitting the right content and/or tone.

And I will persist - but first I have to write more stories, because you've seen virtually everything of mine that's remotely suitable!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catrambo
2009-03-19 02:29 am UTC (link)
When I say outright that I want the person to send more, I always mean it. It may mean that I think that somewhere down the road they're going to produce a killer story or it may mean exactly what you say - not this one, but another may well hit.

Now go write some more, Brian.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]icecreamempress
2009-03-18 11:39 pm UTC (link)
A) I think this is quite diplomatic and clear.

B) Have you thought about including a less-personalized version of this in the submissions FAQ?

Because the information that "we take 1 out of 100 stories we receive" is something that is well known to pros and comes as an INCREDIBLE surprise to many people new to the idea of seeking publication. If I had a dollar for every client who thought that magazines and anthologies were desperate for submissions in general, I would have many many dollars.

I once asked a college writing class what percentage of submitted short stories they thought The New Yorker rejected, and I swear to god the majority answer was "50%."

Which goes some way toward explaining what often comes off as hubris or entitlement to people who have been doing this stuff for years.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catrambo
2009-03-19 02:30 am UTC (link)
I think that's an excellent suggestion and I'm making a note to myself to do so.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]nihilistic_kid, 2009-03-20 10:49 pm UTC

[info]boonofdoom
2009-03-18 11:41 pm UTC (link)
Very well said!

I have occasionally responded to queries somewhat similar to this, where the writer asks for more explanation than I had already given on a story I'd already read and rejected. But asking for a private crit *before* submitting definitely strikes me as going too far.

Also: never a good idea to put words into an editor's mouth when you're asking them for something.

But the feeling I get is that you and your readers regard me a worthless loser.


Something like this, to me, is a red flag that the conversation has moved beyond professionalism.

(Reply to this)


[info]jimkeller
2009-03-19 12:39 am UTC (link)
It speaks very highly of you that you took the time to answer. Thank you on this writer's behalf (because the ones who would write a letter like that are generally the type who won't say it), and thank you for sharing it here, where I can point people who make this same complaint to their fellow writers....

(Reply to this)


[info]drachin8
2009-03-19 12:53 am UTC (link)
That was a very classy response, and I hope the emailer appreciates the time you took in crafting it. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]jeanhuets
2009-03-19 12:59 am UTC (link)
I don't think it would have ever occurred to me to write a letter like this

Same here, but I've done so many benighted things in my life, I can only cringe in sympathy.

Anyway, it's nice to see kindness happening. I hope your cats appreciate it. "D

(Reply to this)


[info]timwb
2009-03-19 02:24 am UTC (link)
Well, I appreciate it.

Your response was kind and patient, and the timing in my case was impeccable.

It kept me from doing something I now see is silly.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catrambo
2009-03-19 02:42 am UTC (link)
I was hoping it'd be helpful to at least a couple of people.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]silviamg
2009-03-19 02:56 am UTC (link)
Mmmm... with so much slush I tend to think editor's don't remember me, so I don't take it as a personal slight when someone rejects me over and over again.

(Reply to this)


[info]grayrose76
2009-03-19 04:16 am UTC (link)
Cat - thank you for yet again serving as a role model of courtesy and professionalism.

Thing is, that internet networking, and LJ in particular, can create an illusion of false intimacy between writers and editors. A writer follows an editor's blog and feels he or she has a personal relationship with the said editor. Being rejected by someone you feel you know is harder than being rejected by a faceless stranger; and it is also easier, I think, to ask a favor of someone you feel you know.

Those are, of course, false assumptions. The fact that you follow an editor's LJ does not make you a friend of the said editor. Even if a personal relationship does exist, it certainly does not guarantee a sale. I have been rejected by editors who are my LJ friends and who moreover accepted my work at other times. That's part and parcel of this business.

(Reply to this)


[info]douglascohen
2009-03-19 04:36 am UTC (link)
Regarding everything you said in this post after your letter to this person ...preach it, sister!

(Reply to this)


[info]wendigomountain
2009-03-19 05:06 am UTC (link)
And it's stories like this that make me run away like a frightened squirrel if people suggest I read slush. There's a lot of pain in that letter. I think you handled it well.

(Reply to this)


[info]jeffsoesbe
2009-03-19 06:49 am UTC (link)
That's a very kind and understanding response you gave.

I'm sure that we've all felt similar to the way the letter writer did, at one time or another.

Jay Lake's quote about how it takes "near-pathological persistence" to succeed in this business really rings true at times like these...

- yeff

(Reply to this)


[info]rcloenen_ruiz
2009-03-19 10:36 am UTC (link)
You are amazing. I bet the writer of that letter has become a fan forever.

My response to rejection is to grit my teeth, stick out my chin, go write another story, and try again.

(Reply to this)


[info]catephoenix
2009-03-19 01:26 pm UTC (link)
Well put, and further proof of your wonderfulness.

(Reply to this)


[info]hildebabble
2009-03-19 01:57 pm UTC (link)
"But the feeling I get is that you and your readers regard me a worthless loser. Is there any way that I could send you a piece that I'm presently working on and receive some feedback before I send in the final draft?"

Whoa.

Some people's frustration manifests more strongly than others, I guess.

Good response, you. *salute*

(Reply to this)


[info]countesslovlace
2009-03-19 02:38 pm UTC (link)
Thanks, Cat, for going above and beyond the call of duty as a force for good in the writer universe.

It takes a whole lot more effort for a fiction writer (and I suspect, artist, actor, musician) to advance in their profession than for practitioners of other forms of endeavor. Basically, you need to get an A- to pass the course. So here you are, writing B+ stories, and your friends who are not writers are making a living (well, before this economy anyway) with their B+ work. And the world makes you feel like you're a D student. You need to work on your craft, so that you start writing a few A- stories, and work on your marketing, so you send them to to the appropriate editor, and work on your productivity, so that you have more chances to win.

(Reply to this)


[info]ken_schneyer
2009-03-19 05:47 pm UTC (link)
You're right, of course about the letter. Poor thing.

But there's an interesting observation here:

I also know as both writer and editor that thickskinnedness and persistence help a lot.

Persistence, obviously. Thickskinnedness [a real word?] -- well, yes, in the best of all possible worlds. But there may be an inherent contradiction between "Artist" and "Thick-skinned". Artists put on the line the things they care about most, expose their frailties to the world, and then ruthlessly rip those expressions apart in order to make them work. It would leave anyone a bit touchy.

Back when I was an acting student, I once complained in a journal entry that I shouldn't have to pull out the most desperate, painful pieces of my life to use them in performance. "Shouldn't some things be sacred and private?" I wrote. My instructor wrote back in the margin: "The artist is an imperialist conquistador who plunders his own inner city, again and again."

So writers can be forgiven for taking rejection personally. Of course I (myself) know that it isn't personal, and I (myself) know, in Kate Wilhelm's words, that "I am not my story." But it takes an act of will and self-discipline to stay in that place, and it feels like a tiny victory every time I send the rejected story out to the next market.

This actually reminds me a lot of our earlier conversation about the word "racism." Over-sensitive artists who don't know much about race theory take the sentence "This story is racist" to mean "You are an offensive criminal." Similarly, over-sensitive artists take "This story is not right for us" to mean "You suck." It isn't true; but I know why they feel that way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catrambo
2009-03-19 05:57 pm UTC (link)
We can all TOTALLY sympathize with that, I agree. But I'd argue that a writer needs to build a sense of self that allows them to move forward even when the message they're getting from the world is disapproving or even hostile. I know it's one of life's most difficult tasks to build that, but I also think it's a strategy that writers (and artists of all stripes) would be wise to follow.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]silk_noir
2009-03-19 07:37 pm UTC (link)
Nope. You didn't sound pissed off.

(Reply to this)


(50 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…